π Link to the Text of the Act
π Why It Was Done
FISA was enacted after revelations of widespread domestic spying (e.g., the Church Committee) to regulate government surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes and establish judicial oversight.
π Pre-existing Law or Constitutional Rights
Prior intelligence gathering relied on executive claims of inherent authority. FISA created a statutory framework with judicial checks, aiming to protect Fourth Amendment rights while enabling national security investigations.
π Overreach or Proper Role?
Supporters say it struck a balance between security and privacy. Critics argue the secretive FISA Court acts as a βrubber stamp,β and amendments after 9/11 expanded its scope to mass surveillance.
π Who or What It Controls
- β’Intelligence and law enforcement agencies (NSA, FBI, CIA)
- β’Telecommunications providers assisting with surveillance orders
- β’Foreign powers and agents targeted under U.S. jurisdiction
π Key Sections / Citations
- β’50 U.S.C. Β§ 1801 (definitions)
- β’50 U.S.C. Β§ 1803 (establishment of the FISA Court)
- β’50 U.S.C. Β§ 1805 (orders approving electronic surveillance)
- β’50 U.S.C. Β§ 1881a (Section 702 β added in 2008, authorizing broad surveillance of foreign communications)
π Recent Changes or Live Controversies
- β’PATRIOT Act (2001) and FISA Amendments Act (2008) greatly expanded FISA powers
- β’Section 702 reauthorizations remain highly controversial, with critics citing warrantless collection of Americansβ communications
- β’Ongoing congressional debates about reforms, transparency, and oversight
π Official Sources
- β’
- β’
- β’