← Back to Rights
⚖️

Due Process (Procedural)

Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments

Procedural due process ensures that government follows fair procedures before depriving you of life, liberty, or property. It's the "how" of government action — requiring notice and a hearing before taking away important interests.

Overview

Procedural due process is about fairness in government procedures. Before government can take away your life, liberty, or property, it must give you notice and an opportunity to be heard. The specific procedures required depend on how important the interest is and how much process would help.

This breakdown uses the TICRI Constitutional Rights methodology to provide:

  • 📜 Constitutional Text
  • 💭 Plain English Explanation
  • ✅ What IS Protected
  • ❌ What is NOT Protected
  • ⚖️ Key Supreme Court Cases
  • 🔍 Real-World Applications

📜 Constitutional Text

"No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law..."

— Fifth Amendment (applies to federal government)

"...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law..."

— Fourteenth Amendment (applies to states)

💭 Plain English Explanation

Before government takes away something important from you (your freedom, property, benefits, job, etc.), it must follow fair procedures. At minimum, this means:

  • • Notice: You must be told what government plans to do and why
  • • Opportunity to be heard: Chance to present your side before neutral decision-maker
  • • Fair tribunal: Impartial judge or decision-maker

The more important the interest at stake, the more process you're entitled to. Criminal trial = extensive procedures (jury, lawyer, etc.). Parking ticket = minimal procedures.

Two Types of Due Process:

  • • Procedural: Fair procedures (this page)
  • • Substantive: Limits on what government can do regardless of procedures (separate page)

✅ What IS Protected

✓ Property Interests

Government benefits you have a legitimate claim to: welfare benefits, public employment, professional licenses, government contracts. Not all property — must be "entitlement" with legitimate claim of entitlement, not just abstract need or desire.

✓ Liberty Interests

Freedom from physical restraint (arrest, imprisonment, commitment to mental institution), damage to reputation combined with loss of employment opportunity, and fundamental rights. Liberty is broadly construed.

✓ Life Interests

Death penalty requires extensive due process protections. Government cannot take your life without the most rigorous procedural safeguards (full criminal trial, appeals, heightened scrutiny).

✓ Public School Discipline

Students have property/liberty interest in education. Before suspension or expulsion, student entitled to notice and hearing (though informal hearing may suffice for short suspensions).

✓ Government Employment

Tenured public employees have property interest in continued employment. Before firing, entitled to notice of reasons and opportunity to respond. "At-will" employees have less protection.

✓ Parental Rights

Parents have fundamental liberty interest in custody and care of children. Before state terminates parental rights, must provide full procedural protections including hearing, representation, and proof by clear and convincing evidence.

❌ What is NOT Protected (Or Limited Protection)

✗ Government Benefits Without Entitlement

No due process right to receive government benefits in first place. Must show legitimate claim of entitlement to existing benefit. Initial application for benefits gets less process than termination of existing benefits.

✗ Damage to Reputation Alone

Injury to reputation by itself doesn't trigger due process protection. Must be combined with deprivation of more tangible interest (like loss of job). "Stigma-plus" test requires reputation harm plus denial of right or status.

✗ Emergency Situations

In genuine emergencies, government can act first and provide hearing later. Public health emergencies, contaminated food seizures, or immediate safety threats may justify post-deprivation process.

✗ Random or Unauthorized Government Acts

When deprivation is result of random, unauthorized act by government employee (not established procedure), post-deprivation remedy (like lawsuit) may be sufficient process. Due process doesn't require pre-deprivation hearing for every negligent act.

✗ Right to Specific Procedures

No absolute right to particular type of hearing (oral vs. written, lawyer, cross-examination). Court balances interests using Mathews v. Eldridge test to determine what process is due.

⚖️ Key Supreme Court Cases

Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)

Balancing Test for Procedures — Established three-factor test to determine what process is due: (1) private interest affected, (2) risk of erroneous deprivation and value of additional procedures, (3) government's interest including administrative burden.

Disability benefits case. Court balanced interests and found written hearing sufficient — didn't need oral hearing before termination. This balancing test is used in most procedural due process cases.

Goldberg v. Kelly (1970)

Welfare Benefits Require Pre-Termination Hearing — Before terminating welfare benefits, government must provide evidentiary hearing. Welfare benefits are "property" requiring due process protection.

Landmark case recognizing welfare benefits as property interest. Welfare recipients brutally need assistance; cannot terminate without hearing first. Established "new property" concept for government benefits.

Goss v. Lopez (1975)

School Suspension Requires Notice and Hearing — Students have property/liberty interest in public education. Before suspension, school must provide notice of charges and opportunity to explain. Even short suspensions trigger due process.

Students suspended for 10 days. Court held this required minimal due process (informal hearing, notice, chance to respond). More serious discipline requires more elaborate procedures.

Board of Regents v. Roth (1972)

Defined "Property" and "Liberty" — Property interests created by state law, not Constitution. Must have legitimate claim of entitlement, not just abstract need. Liberty includes freedom from restraint and protection of good name.

Non-tenured professor not rehired. No property interest because no tenure — just one-year contract. Defined framework for identifying what interests trigger due process protection.

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill (1985)

Public Employee Firing Requires Pre-Termination Hearing — Tenured public employees entitled to notice and opportunity to respond before termination. Can't balance away constitutional protection by providing only post-termination hearing.

State law gave property interest (tenure), which triggers due process. Must provide some pre-termination process (even if brief), not just elaborate post-termination hearing.

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)

Enemy Combatant Detention Requires Due Process — U.S. citizen detained as enemy combatant entitled to meaningful opportunity to contest detention. Even in war context, must provide notice, chance to be heard, and neutral decision-maker.

War on terror case. Executive detention power not unlimited — citizen detainees have due process rights. Must be able to challenge factual basis for enemy combatant designation.

🔍 Real-World Applications

The Mathews Balancing Test (Most Common Framework)

Courts balance three factors:

  1. Private interest: How important is the interest to the individual? (Job? Benefits? Freedom?)
  2. Risk of error: How likely is wrong decision without more procedures? Will additional procedures help?
  3. Government interest: What's the cost/burden of additional procedures?

More important private interest + high error risk + low government burden = more process required

Government Employment

Tenured employees: Property interest in job, entitled to pre-termination notice and hearing. Probationary/at-will employees: Generally no property interest, less process required. Contractors: Depends on contract terms and whether creates "entitlement."

Government Benefits (Welfare, Social Security, etc.)

Once receiving benefits, have property interest. Before termination, entitled to notice and opportunity to contest. Level of hearing varies — may be written submission rather than oral hearing depending on Mathews factors.

Driver's License Suspension

License is property interest. Before suspension for cause (DUI, etc.), entitled to hearing. Emergency suspensions (immediate safety threat) may occur first with prompt post-suspension hearing. Administrative hearing generally sufficient — don't need full trial.

Immigration Context

Non-citizens have some due process rights, but limited compared to citizens. Generally entitled to removal hearing before immigration judge. But scope of review and procedures vary based on entry status and claims raised.

What Due Process Typically Includes

  • Notice of proposed action and reasons
  • Opportunity to present your side (written or oral)
  • Neutral, impartial decision-maker
  • Right to see evidence against you (usually)
  • Right to present evidence and witnesses
  • Written decision with findings (in many contexts)
  • Right to counsel (criminal cases and some civil contexts)

Key Takeaways

  • ✓Before taking your life, liberty, or property, government must provide fair procedures
  • ✓At minimum: notice of what government plans to do and opportunity to be heard
  • ✓Mathews balancing test determines what specific procedures are required
  • ✓"Property" includes government benefits you have legitimate entitlement to (welfare, public job, licenses)
  • ✓"Liberty" includes freedom from restraint, parental rights, and fundamental freedoms
  • ✓More important the interest, more procedures required — death penalty gets most protection